01482 778 463
Client Focussed
No Win No Fee
Specialist Legal Teams

Tag Archive: Randox testing errors

More convictions overturned as CPS contacts people in Randox Testing Services forensics investigation

Drug test blank form

The true scale of the Randox Testing Services forensic testing scandal is now beginning to emerge as more people are being contacted by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to be told their convictions were not reliable.

Our team here at Hudgell Solicitors handling damages claims relating to inaccurate Randox results are being contacted by an increasing number of people as the investigation continues.

From the information we now have, it is our expectation that this number will continue growing as more tests are reexamined throughout the rest of the year.

Results of forensic tests carried out by the Manchester-based company first came under question last February, when it was revealed two employees had been arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice.

That put into doubt the validity of around 10,000 forensic tests which had been sent to the firm in cases from 42 police forces across the country.

The majority relate to driving offences, but concerns have also been raised that test results relied on by the civil courts to determine issues such as child custody and employment cases could also have been affected.

Letters confirming unsafe forensic results are a relief – but come after damage has been done

It has, of course, come as a huge relief to every one of the people we are representing to be contacted and told by the CPS, or the police force directly involved itself, that the forensic test which caused them to be convicted was not safe.

Many of those we are representing had felt their convictions to be unjust and simply couldn’t understand how they had been found guilty, but they felt unable to argue against what was considered to be indisputable scientific evidence.

We now know this was certainly not the case.

Sadly, for each and every person wrongfully convicted of an offence as a result of inaccurate or unsafe results, the damage has been done.

We are currently supporting people who have lost their employment as a result of a wrongful conviction, whilst driving bans have also caused major disruption to lives.

As specialists in handling civil liberties and human rights cases, our team are committed to ensuring people are rightly compensated for their suffering.

We have been able to put clients in touch with experts in criminal law to ensure their convictions are overturned, and through our own expertise we are seeking civil redress, holding both Randox Testing Services, and the individual police forces to account.

Given the high importance of the role they were entrusted to take up on behalf of police forces to ensure samples were properly tested, there was clear duty of care on Randox Testing Services.

Police forces also have to be questioned fully over their roles in this totally unacceptable situation, with serious investigation needed to consider whether this situation could have been prevented.

All of the people we are representing have had their reputations damaged or lives affected in some form.

Without doubt, these people deserve firstly an apology, and compensating for the impact it has had on their lives.

Read More

09/04/2018 No Comments

‘People don’t think they can challenge forensic test results – but thousands are now in doubt and people should question convictions’

Lab testing

A lawyer representing people taking legal action against a forensic testing company after inaccurate results led to them being wrongly convicted says ‘wide-scale injustice’ could be uncovered as thousands more tests are reviewed.

Civil liberties specialists Hudgell Solicitors are advising a number of people who have had their convictions overturned as a result of samples being retested after coming back from Manchester-based Randox Testing Services with positive readings.

Just last week it was revealed that chef Billal Hartford, 21, of North Yorkshire, was wrongly banned from driving for a year, causing him to lose his job, when his test results suggested he’d been guilty of drug-driving.

He subsequently requested that his sample be retested after a major investigation into around 10,000 tests conducted at RTS was announced in February, following the arrest of two former employees on suspicion of the ‘manipulation’ of samples.

Now, Mr Petherbridge says another man, of West Yorkshire, is also taking action after having his conviction overturned following a retest.

He says the conviction – also for drug driving – has damaged his reputation with his employers, caused embarrassment for both he and his family and impacted significantly on his day to day life over the past year.

RTS was used by police forces across the UK, but following the arrest of two former employees in February, and allegations of samples being ‘manipulated’, tests – and resulting convictions – from more than 40 forces are now being reviewed.

‘Conviction damaged my reputation and embarrassed me and my family’

“It has had a massive impact on my life, and most of all it has damaged my reputation and been an embarrassment to myself and my family,” said the man, of Leeds, who asked not to be named.

“It really didn’t go down well with my employers. They thankfully were very good about it and allowed me to keep my job, but I had to go in and see my manager and say that I’d been convicted at court. That was difficult and it meant I couldn’t drive, which I had to do at work on occasion.

“It was a very difficult time for me, and all the time I couldn’t understand how I had tested positive, but yet you don’t feel you can argue with scientific results.

“It was all very quick from the police stopping me to the results coming back and me being in court. I was advised to plead guilty because of the evidence against me – evidence which was completely wrong. Still, I couldn’t say to my employer ‘I’m innocent, but I pleaded guilty’. It was all very strange.”

The man had been stopped by West Yorkshire Police last December, having spent the evening with friends. He says his passenger had smoked some cannabis that night, and when officers stopped his car, they said they could smell the drug.

“As they said they could smell cannabis and because I was driving, they wanted to test me. I knew I would not be positive but the officer said he wasn’t happy with the result and that I’d have to come to the station.

“I couldn’t believe it, but I’d never been in trouble with the police at all before so I just thought it best not to argue and do what I was told.

“When I got home, just before midnight, I had to explain to my parents that I’d been arrested at the station to give a sample for drug driving. My family were very supportive, but disappointed in me. I felt awful and stressed that I was sure I had done no wrong.”

Result wrongly suggested man had been almost three times over drug-drive limit

The man received a letter in January saying his sample had shown him to almost three times over the drug-drive limit. He was advised, in the face of scientific evidence, to plead guilty when appearing at Bradford Magistrates Court in February, receiving a 12-month driving ban and a £400 fine.

“I couldn’t really believe what had happened to me,” he said.

“At one point the magistrate was talking about banning me for three years. Losing a driving licence has a massive impact on life. My dad has had to drive me around and to and from work.

“I was also playing for an amateur football team at a decent level at the time but I had to quit that because I couldn’t travel to games. I also sold my car because I didn’t want it sat there for a year not being used.”

He finally had his conviction overturned when contacted by the court in November to say his sample had been retested and found to be negative. His licence was reinstated last week.

He says he now feels for others in the same situation as he found himself, and added: “It has damaged my trust and faith in the legal system. This was my first experience of it and I don’t have confidence in the police now.

“I just can’t understand it all. If the results of tests are found to have been deliberately manipulated, serious questions have to be asked why. What is the motivation for people to do that?

“Even if it is found not to have been a deliberate act, still how on earth can it happen? This is peoples’ lives we are talking about.”

‘Innocent people are wrongly having reputations and lives damaged’

Mr Petherbridge says Hudgell Solicitors is supporting a number of people who have had their convictions overturned after samples were tested at RTS.

He said: “This is quickly developing into a major scandal. We are now taking on new cases and there could be wide-scale injustice discovered as this investigation goes on.

“It has been reported that up to a quarter of the affected cases across 42 police forces were used in hundreds of cases relating to crimes such as rape, murder and sudden death. It is worrying to thing convictions in such cases could be unsafe.

“The simple facts are that innocent people are having their reputations damaged by false convictions. It is damaging to their lives at home, and at work, and socially.

“It is unacceptable that, for whatever the reason, people are being wrongly convicted. Randox Testing Services were responsible for ensuring the tests – on which livelihoods and liberties were at stake – were accurate.

“For results to be come back and lead to people being wrongly convicted is a disgrace.

“Clients have said to us that didn’t feel they could challenge the results of a forensic test. Our advice to people is that if you believe you were innocent, ask if your test could be one of the thousands under question and find out.”

The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) has said around 1,500 retests will have been completed by the end of the year, but it could take as long as three years to complete the full investigation.

Read More

21/12/2017 No Comments

Looking to see if you're eligible?

Get in touch for free legal advice

0808 159 7699

Call today to speak to an expert

Start your claim

What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star


"Quick, efficient service provided by Jayne Woodock. Would definitely contact Hudgell Solicitors again in the… "


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Thank you

"I have never had to go down the route of claiming for anything like this… "


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

No problems from start to finish for my…

"No problems from start to finish for my claim.Kept updated regularly and a good outcome… "


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star


"Very professional,efficient service,informative and friendly service. I would highly recommend Hudgell solicitors."


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Good experience

"Good experience"

Margaret Elizabeth

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star


"Friendly, helpful and professional."


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I would recommend this firm of…solicitor to anyone

"I would recommend this firm of solicitor to anyone I have had a 5 star… "

Jimmy Mc

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very helpful and thorough

"Very helpful and thorough. The team kept me updated throughout. Thank you"


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Couldn’t fault Hudgell Solicitors.

"Couldn’t fault Hudgell Solicitors. They were professional, pleasant informative and helpful and got a result… "


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Case still ongoing

"Case still ongoing, excellent communication between myself and solicitor.. 🤞🏻 for good outcome"


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent and fast

"Excellent and fast. I won’t go anywhere else from now on"


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very helpful

"Listened too, great advice and feel rejuvenated by their response. Really helpful feedback and will… "

Mr Procter

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great Service

"Hudgell Solicitors dealt with my case very quickly and effectively. The contact and communication was… "


trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Fantastic service

"Fantastic service, on the ball with everything and good outcome"

Hayley coleman

Rated 8.3 out of 10 based on 495 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

Our offices


55 Fleet Street
DX 437 Chancery Lane
SRA No. 607141



No 2 @ The Dock
46 Humber Street
DX 11923 Hull
SRA no. 521372



10 Park Place
DX 744770 Leeds 19
SRA No. 544561



1 St Peter’s Square
Third Floor
M2 3AE
SRA No. 655049


© 2019 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90