01482 778 463

We're here to help 01482 778 463

CLAIM ONLINE
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | How does ‘contributory negligence’ impact upon motorcyclists?

How does ‘contributory negligence’ impact upon motorcyclists?

Motorcycle Case


By Tony Carter, incident and advice investigation specialist

When motorcyclists have accidents, it is often the motorcyclist that is considered blameworthy. On this basis, the third-party insurers will often, whatever the circumstances try and hold the motorcyclist 100% liable for the cause of the crash, simply so they can contest liability and mitigate their losses and, therefore, hopefully reduce the overall costs to their shareholders.

So in simple terms, someone will try and allege what is known in the trade as ‘contributory negligence’, which essentially means that, although the other party is still liable, you are also held partially to blame. This contributory negligence can range from 0% to 100% depending on the circumstances. The reason I mention this is that (and I hate to have to admit this) often riders will tell stories of bravado, or they will try and show their mates how good they are, but very little thought is given to the consequences if it all goes pear-shaped, not from the injury point of view, but from the point of view that it could seriously affect the amount of compensation you may get.

So, for example:

Filtering: Something most of us do on a daily basis and is perfectly legal as it is only another word for overtaking.

Many riders (and drivers for that matter) are still unsure about the legalities of filtering, but providing it is done sensibly and safely, it does not usually cause a problem as far as making a claim is concerned when things go wrong.

Many defendant insurers and law firms will still try and use the case of Powell v Moody (1966) as their statutory defence, even though there is much more current case law which can and does work in our favour.  Filtering crashes have to be judged on the evidence and on merit, not on some obsolete piece of case law.

Providing you have complied with some basic common-sense rules, for example, not straddling or crossing a central, solid white-line system, not overtaking between ‘No Overtaking’ signs, not filtering close to a junction or turning on your right, and you do not cause other vehicles to alter course or speed, then you should not experience too many problems.

On the flip side, I often get asked about ‘undertaking’, for example on a motorway where a driver chooses to sit in the middle lane instead of using the left lane despite the fact that the left-hand lane is clear. Many TV programmes will have you believe that undertaking is illegal.  The bottom line is that there is no specific offence of nearside overtake and, in some cases, undertaking is a legitimate manoeuvre, for example, when traffic is queuing in lanes 2 and 3 (middle and outside lanes) and lane 1 (the inside lane) remains clear.

To secure a prosecution, it would have to be shown that the undertake was careless or dangerous. But, as with all cases, the findings are determined on the specific circumstances and the evidence.

Kit: Many threads on various forum boards have gone on about the idiots who, during the hot summer weather have chosen to wear nothing more than a pair of shorts and a T-shirt (and I am sure we have all seen them in our time).

OK, we may think that people who choose to wear such kit (or lack of it) are idiots and it certainly cannot be disputed that these people have no protection, and, yes, it will hurt if you come off, but the question often asked is: how much will it affect my compensation? Well, firstly, let’s deal with a crash helmet:

It is a legal requirement to wear a securely-fastened helmet whilst riding a bike in the UK. If you choose to ride without a helmet, or not fasten the strap properly, then it will most likely affect your compensation.  If the injuries you sustained could have been avoided had you been wearing a helmet or one that was securely-fastened, then it is likely that your compensation will be reduced by a percentage to reflect the degree of fault attributed to you.

In respect of normal riding kit, there is currently no case law where the defence has been successful in having the amount of damages awarded reduced because the rider was not wearing recognised protective equipment other than a helmet.

Speed: It is not uncommon for the other side to make an allegation of excess speed, particularly when motorcycles are involved.  It is not for you to prove that you were travelling at or below the speed limit, it is for the defence to prove that you were exceeding the limit and so, unless the crash is of a catastrophic nature, then the chances of the police having carried out a full accident investigation are pretty remote and, on that basis, the chances of excess speed (if indeed you were travelling above the limit) being proven against you are unlikely. Riding without a licence or insurance would not prevent a rider making a personal injury claim if their accident was deemed not to be their fault and, whilst they may be prosecuted for traffic offences, there may be no contributory negligence as far as any civil action is concerned.

This, perhaps, gives you a bit of a flavour. Civil law and claims work differently to road traffic laws although there can be an overlap in some instances, but if you are unfortunate enough to have an off, make sure that you have your story straight before you say anything; if needs be, call us at Hudgell’s, as we can determine what is and is not likely to affect your claim.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

The Author

author image

Tony Carter

Incident and Advice Investigation Specialist

ac@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request a callback from a solicitor

 I am an existing client.









What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hiya you work real good for me I'm …

"Hiya you work real good for me I'm happy for you do for me and… "

Ms Anne Ollier

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service. I have been kept informed every step of the way. When I have… "

maggie ackroyd

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service, the Solicitor kept me informed on all progress with regular phone calls and… "

Miss Rebecca Shaw

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Would 100% recommend and use again

"Whilst having to deal with a difficult company who was denying I ever worked for… "

Danny Morfitt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Fantastic service from beginning to …

"Fantastic service from beginning to end. Cant really say much more than that."

Craig

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

My case

"I have always found your service very good,always up to date with what was going… "

Miss Julie johnson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great service

"Great service, friendly and hard working staff"

Mr Mohamed Jaouadi

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent customer care

"Once my claim was accepted I was kept informed throughout the negotiating process very professional… "

Mr Terence John Casey

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent Company

"Fast, friendly and honest service. Could not be happier with how my claim was handled… "

Miss Stacie King

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very prompt along every step of the way

"Very prompt along every step of the way"

Miss Rachel Victoria Joseph

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service. Regular updates on my case and felt they had my best interests in… "

Mr Paul Hewson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell's have been very sensitive and …

"Hudgell's have been very sensitive and thorough with their support of me in my case.… "

Mrs Lisa Russell

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

excellent

"made my claim so easy and straight forward kept me updated and organised everything thank… "

Miss Sian Clarke

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Highly Recommend

"Cannot recommend enough. Informative all the way through and always honest. Never a problem to… "

Miss P

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent I would recommend to anyone

"Excellent ,Very happy with the out come ,will use this company again."

Mr Darren Paul Greaves

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent friendly service

"I always felt Samantha was working for me, all my questions were answered in a… "

Tony Squires

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very happy

"My case was dealt with very well and I was kept upto date with everything… "

Mr Glen Harrison

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Medical Negligence Claim

"My claim was initially lodged with a firm of solicitors but was later transferred to… "

Mr. Shepherd

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Professional and caring.

"I find them helpful and honest.I would definitely recommend them."

Mr Michael Grundy

Rated 9.2 out of 10 based on 290 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

© 2017 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90