01482 778 463
Client Focussed
No Win No Fee
Specialist Legal Teams
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | The unfairness of the law on bereavement damages following fatal accidents

The unfairness of the law on bereavement damages following fatal accidents

Man comforting his sad mourning friend


In this enlightened age you may be surprised to learn that following a fatal accident a cohabiting partner has no entitlement to an award of bereavement damages.  The statutory payment of £12,980 is payable to the husband or wife left behind and to a formal civil partner,  but not to anyone whose relationship – however long and however meaningful  –  had not been formalised by a marriage certificate or civil partnership registration.  This wholly unsatisfactory situation has recently come for review by the Court of Appeal in the case of Jacqueline Smith v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and others. The finding of the Court was that the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 allows cohabitees to claim for dependency but does not permit them to claim bereavement damages. This distinction was found to be incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.  While the Act remains law this situation cannot be altered but consideration should be given to paying bereavement damages to cohabitees.    The Judges sitting in the Court of Appeal made the following observations:

  • Cohabitees of long-standing should be entitled to bereavement damages, but are not so entitled while the Fatal Accidents Act is in its present form;
  • Arguably, other classes of claimants may be entitled to bereavement damages;
  • Until the Act is changed compensators (including public authorities) are not obliged to pay bereavement damages to cohabitees; and
  • Where bereavement damages are paid to a claimant, he or she should not be entitled to a further award for loss of care and affection.

In Smith the Court of Appeal found that the provision of bereavement damages was a measure by which the State shows respect for family life, which is a core value of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. There was no real justification to discriminate against long-standing cohabitees particularly where those same people could recover damages for loss of dependency, and would experience the exact same grief which the award exists to compensate for.

The Court of Appeal declared that the relevant part of the Fatal Accidents Act is incompatible with the Convention. It now falls to Parliament to amend the Act.

Will insurers do the decent thing? Until the Act is amended they are not obliged to pay bereavement damages to cohabitees. We will though look to include such a claim wherever possible and argue the moral obligation at this stage.

What about the separate awards for loss of care and affection?   Historically in an effort to justify some payment for a bereaved cohabitee claimant’s solicitors, including us, have sought to claim a modest amount in this respect. The Court did not comment on claims for damages for the loss of a partner’s care and affection (as distinct from bereavement damages),  but its confirmation of what bereavement damages  are meant to compensate for seemed to be a clear indication that a person awarded  formal bereavement damages  should not receive any separate award.

Will other people be able qualify for bereavement damages?

The entitlement to a bereavement damages award – other than to married or civil partners – is very limited.  For example a parent suffering a death of a child of 18 years of age or over has no such entitlement  –  whereas under that age they do –  and  I have seen many tragic cases involving the deaths of young unmarried  girls and boys where this has been the case.  It is a very difficult thing to explain to a mother or father that the law dictates that the death of their child will result in little or no compensation at all.

The Court of Appeal made clear the existing scope of bereavement damages as “intended to reflect the grief that ordinarily flows from the intimacy which is usually an inherent part of the relationship between husband and wife and civil partners.” It is rigid in its wording and until Parliament looks again at the Fatal Accidents – as indeed it should – there will be no entitlement to anyone outside its current scope.  Again it is to be hope that insurers look to do the decent thing in these tragic cases.

Contact us for advice following loss of a loved one from a fatal accident.  We will do all that we can to help.

 

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

The Author

author image

Jane Woodcock

Senior Legal Executive and Head of Personal Injury

jw@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request A Callback

I am an existing client.










Or call us FREE on:

01482 778 463


trust pilot

The data you submit will only be used by Hudgell Solicitors and only for the purpose of dealing with your enquiry.
See full privacy policy.

Looking to see if you're eligible?

Get in touch for free legal advice

0808 159 7699

Call today to speak to an expert

OR
Start your claim

What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Dispute with EasyJet

"Although Hudgell offices were not local to us, there was no need for concern, as… "

Glyn

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Always on the ball

"Always on the ball! Great at what they do, very professional and fast with a… "

CHRISTOPHER CURTIS

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service. Very happy with result. Thank you."

Miss Erika Panakova

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Was an easy process and the caseworker…

"Was an easy process and the caseworker was very informative and very knowledgeable on my… "

Rachel Fee

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Lovely business to deal with

"Lovely business to deal with. Would recommend to anyone."

Mrs Kelly Byrnes

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great communication

"Great communication! My solicitor was lovely to deal with, open and listened to me."

Sue Ockendon

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very happy with how they managed my…

"Very happy with how they managed my claim. I would recommend them."

Mr Steve Roberts

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very helpful and truly understanding in…

"Very helpful and truly understanding in a very sensitive case would highly recommend to anyone"

Miss Sarah Morris

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Friendly

"Friendly, supportive and professional, couldn't ask for more."

Mr Adrian Fisher

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

A first class service with a heart too

"I never had claimed before and was quite apprehensive about dealing with claims solicitors as… "

M Sheikh

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

They made me feel that I wouldn’t be on…

"They made me feel that I wouldn’t be on my own after my experience. They… "

Mrs Melinda Diane Tovey

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

The service was excellent and Lauren…

"The service was excellent and Lauren Cartwright kept me well informed and gave good advice… "

Mr Roger Harrison

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Recommended company

"Excellent service, fully recommended. Efficient communication and reliable."

Mr R Taylor

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell took over my road traffic case…

"Hudgell took over my road traffic case from a different solicitors and successfully negotiated a… "

Mr JSW

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell Solicitors made my personal…

"Hudgell Solicitors made my personal injury claim so easy, they got me the treatment i… "

Mr Nick Todd

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I have never used solicitors before

"I have never used solicitors before, my dealings with Hudgell have been excellent I have… "

David Varley

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very helpful

"Very helpful"

Ethan Ferguson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

First Class service

"Hudgell Solicitors are currently working on my case and I must say so far the… "

Emma Jeeves

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Always kept me up to date on all…

"Always kept me up to date on all correspondence concerning the case and acknowledged any… "

Mrs Anne Marie Wells

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent solicitors kept us informed…

"Excellent solicitors kept us informed at all times and since it’s been a lengthy case… "

Anon

Rated 9.4 out of 10 based on 453 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

Our offices

London

55 Fleet Street
EC4Y 1JU

VIEW DETAILS

Hull

No 2 @ The Dock
46 Humber Street
HU1 1TU

VIEW DETAILS

Leeds

10 Park Place
Leeds
LS1 2RU

VIEW DETAILS

© 2018 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90