01482 778 463
Client Focussed
No Win No Fee
Specialist Legal Teams
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | Miners failed by Raleys Solicitors may be entitled to more compensation for their vibration injuries.

Miners failed by Raleys Solicitors may be entitled to more compensation for their vibration injuries.



By , professional negligence expert, Neil Hudgell Solicitors.

Between 1999 and 2012, £1.7 billion was paid to miners who suffered vibration injuries whilst working for the National Coal Board, British Coal Corporation and UK Coal.  Hundreds of millions of pounds were also paid to solicitors to advise the miners how to make these claims and the reasonableness of any compensation offers made to them.

But one particular firm – Raleys Solicitors – failed to advise their clients properly and on November 6 2013 His Honour Judge Gosnell, sitting at Leeds County Court, ruled against Raleys Solicitors for the second time for giving injured miners negligent advice.

Miners entitled to claim more for vibration injuries

The case in question was that of Mr Procter.  He had received £11,141 for his injuries but could have, had he received the correct advice, received almost double that amount.  This is because Mr Procter was entitled to make a claim for the tasks he was no longer able to do for himself as a result of his injuries such as DIY, decorating and car maintenance.

Mr Procter is not alone in losing out on compensation: many miners whose vibration injury compensation case was settled by supposed experts are also now discovering that they were wrongly advised and did not receive sufficient compensation.

In Mr Procter’s case, Raleys had sent him a number of standard initial questionnaires to complete, followed by standard letters containing advice about his settlement.

His Honour Judge Gosnell denounces Raleys Solicitors

These three letters are crucial to this claim as they appear to contain the sum total of advice that the claimant received. The claimant claims that he never had any face-to-face meeting with any lawyer employed by the defendants and the defendants have not called any witnesses to give evidence that they actually gave any particular advice.  The defendants have relied on Mr Barber who was a partner at the relevant time who can give evidence that the file shows that the letters were sent and that, in his view, the contents of the letters represent sufficient advice.”

HHJ Gosnell, Para. 10

Entitled to service claims

Raleys had advised Mr Procter to settle his claim in November 2003 for £11,141 without making any allowance for the fact he could no longer mow his lawn, wash his car or even change a plug due to his injuries; despite noting on the file that he could not do this.  All these difficulties meant Mr Procter could have filed for service claims to pay for the costs of getting assistance with these activities.  But, no-one from Raleys met Mr Procter and no-one asked him about this claim. Raley’s defence was that Mr Procter had not told them about these limitations that he was suffering as a result of his vibration injuries.

A specialist solicitor should normally ask questions to ensure a client has provided the information required to progress the claim.  A solicitor should not rely on a client to know what information is needed and should be shared.

The Judge in the case centring on the treatment received by Mr Procter went on to pose an interesting question regarding that duty;

What would a reasonably competent practitioner specialising in this type of work have done?  Would he or she send out a series of long standardised letters to their client and expect him to tick the correct boxes on the tick box form to reflect his instructions or should they have a discussion with the client and try to ensure that he has not only read but understood the correspondence… In my view however it was not too much to ask the solicitor to directly consult with the client to advise him in layman’s terms

HHJ Gosnell, Paras. 26-29

The Judge’s views on Raley’s actions were understandably scathing, having already condemned the same firm not six months previously for the same behaviour.  The implications of this ruling are that in future any solicitor will find it difficult to find an excuse for not having at least a telephone conversation with a client regarding an offer.

Nearly double compensation

In Mr Procter’s case, he would have recovered more than £11,000 on top of his £11,141 – had the claim been made properly.

Mr Procter, like many thousands of others, was a victim of the systems used by Raleys which were designed to process the highest number of claimants for the minimum cost.  The firm had already been subject to findings against them by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for their conduct of these files in 2009.

Raleys alone handled over 12,200 claims for injured miners suffering from vibration injuries including Vibration White Finger, Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Work Related Upper Limb Disorder, taking over £15 million for their work*. Of these 12200 claims, less than 21% included service claims**.

The Scheme paid out to over 170,000 claimants in total.*

Find out what you could be entitled to even if you’ve already claimed for vibration injuries

If you made a claim to the Vibration Scheme but never made a claim for services such as DIY, decorating and assistance with car maintenance then you too may be entitled to further assistance.  Contact our specialist solicitors for a confidential consultation as soon as possible.

*https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48283/4490-vwf-detailed-statistics.pdf

**Barnaby v Raleys Solicitors (2013) at para 16

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

Request a callback

Request A Callback

I am an existing client.










Or call us FREE on:

01482 778 463


trust pilottrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot star

The data you submit will only be used by Hudgell Solicitors and only for the purpose of dealing with your enquiry.
See full privacy policy.

Looking to see if you're eligible?

Get in touch for free legal advice

0808 159 7699

Call today to speak to an expert

OR
Start your claim

What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Case still ongoing

"Case still ongoing, excellent communication between myself and solicitor.. 🤞🏻 for good outcome"

Quantity

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent and fast

"Excellent and fast. I won’t go anywhere else from now on"

Aimee

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very helpful

"Listened too, great advice and feel rejuvenated by their response. Really helpful feedback and will… "

Mr Procter

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great Service

"Hudgell Solicitors dealt with my case very quickly and effectively. The contact and communication was… "

Tracy

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Fantastic service

"Fantastic service, on the ball with everything and good outcome"

Hayley coleman

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very professional

"Very professional, took all the stress off my hands and very pleasant to deal with.… "

Steve

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgsell’s were our insurers with…traffic accident in France - successful claim.

"Hudgsell’s were our insurers with regard to road traffic accidents occurring abroad, (France) we were… "

P. Nevitt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Always honest with there appraisal and…

"Always honest with there appraisal and willing to listen"

Tim Edge/

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Made the whole holiday illness claim…

"Made the whole holiday illness claim stress free. Updates given regularly- overall a pleasure to… "

Kate

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I was fortunate to find Hudgell…

"I was fortunate to find Hudgell Solicitors after having an official complaint upheld. After I… "

James Henderson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great service

"Great service. Kept informed at all times. Good results"

ROY NAYLOR

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very professional and pleasant…

"Very professional and pleasant solicitors .. kept me up to date and was very prompt… "

Julie

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Recommended!

"Friendly, Helpful, and fair. Would recommend Hudgells to anyone I know."

Paul

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Friendly professional service.

"Excellent service all way through."

Sakina begum

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Thrilled

"After not knowing what to do, hudgell have helped me thoroughly through the process and… "

Adam Shutt

Rated 9 out of 10 based on 481 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

Our offices

London

55 Fleet Street
EC4Y 1JU
DX 437 Chancery Lane
SRA No. 607141

VIEW DETAILS

Hull

No 2 @ The Dock
46 Humber Street
HU1 1TU
DX 11923 Hull
SRA no. 521372

VIEW DETAILS

Leeds

10 Park Place
Leeds
LS1 2RU
DX 744770 Leeds 19
SRA No. 544561

VIEW DETAILS

Manchester

1 St Peter’s Square
Third Floor
Manchester
M2 3AE
SRA No. 655049

VIEW DETAILS

© 2019 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90