01482 778 463
Client Focussed
No Win No Fee
Specialist Legal Teams
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | Councils must take responsibility to make towns and cities safer and cut personal injury cases

Councils must take responsibility to make towns and cities safer and cut personal injury cases

Guidhall in Hull


 

It was certainly interesting to read comments from a Hull City Councillor recently relating to the £500,000 bill incurred by the authority over the past two years to compensate people who have suffered personal injuries.

The Councillor expressed dismay at the amount claims have been costing the council, stating that a ‘more robust defence’ will be made in cases in the future, with the authority aiming to save somewhere in the region of an extra £100,000.

It is certainly good to hear the authority is looking at ways to bring the cost to the taxpayer down, but perhaps the first area to examine and question should be exactly why this money has been paid out, and the cause of the injuries suffered.

Although the media article included various comments to ‘spurious claims’, the reality is that compensation is only ever paid out to complainants where there is proven legal liability for the injury suffered, or if the party at fault accepts the blame.

Hull City Council has looked to point the finger at a ‘blame culture’ – ironically missing the fact that it is their failings which have been to blame.

Quite simply, it has paid out £500,000 over the past two years because it has been found at fault – or admitted being at fault – for injuries suffered.

Such settlements compensate people for the pain and suffering caused, but also to provide them with the treatment required to get them back to full health. Settlements include lost earnings.

We see how crucial this support can be. The overwhelming majority of the working population in the private sector are paid only statutory sick pay when absent from work, so even a period of just a few weeks off work can lead to very serious financial difficulties.

Perhaps the question which should be asked in the corridors of The Guildhall is why the compensation bill paid out by Hull City Council is far higher than the East Riding, which presumably has a similar overall mileage of roads and pathways to manage and maintain over its vast area, compared to the concentrated area of Hull.

It would also be interesting to see the total cost of work required to bring public places up to the safety standards required, against the cost of settling cases when people are injured, as the simple fact is that the ball is firmly in Hull City Council’s court to maintain their roads and footpaths as the Highways Act requires them to do.

In short, if the legislation was complied with, then firstly accidents would occur far less frequently and secondly, “pavement” claims could not be successfully pursued.

It was also interesting to read comments on solicitors taking ‘a chunk’ of money from clients.

Let us be under no misapprehension here – the Conditional Fee (no win no fee) system is not a system invented or imposed by Lawyers. It is a system invented and imposed by successive Governments, of which the Hull City Council is a devolved part.

Government’s abolition of legal aid for the vast majority of civil claims more than a decade ago led to the invention and imposition, by Government, of the conditional fee system.

The deduction from damages is part and parcel of that system – a system that does not charge a client for any legal fees at all should their claim be unsuccessful, but does charge a percentage of damages where a claim is successful. That is what Government deemed to be fair.

As an analogy, the Council wouldn’t entertain an argument from its council tax payers that they should only pay for services they use, would it?

People pay a set amount – regardless of whether in their household they are using education or social services facilities – yet there are presumably many people out there who could legitimately run such an argument.

The council are entitled to charge an equal amount to various Band payers because they and the Government deem that to be the fair approach.

So, Government deemed it fair that a successful claimant should pay some limited and fixed contribution towards his or her legal costs, to balance the fact that an unsuccessful claimant might incur legal costs amounting to several thousand pounds, in which case they would pay their solicitors nothing at all.

Given the Council’s pledge to fight off claims more robustly over the next 12 months, legal support may well be needed more often for those who through no fault of their own suffer genuine injuries which impact on their lives.

The councillor in this case has been happy to shout out about a number of what we call ‘personal injury myths’. We can only repeat – claims succeed where there is evidence to show that the council has failed in its duties.  That is the reality of the situation.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

Request a callback

Request A Callback

I am an existing client.










Or call us FREE on:

01482 778 463


trust pilottrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot star

The data you submit will only be used by Hudgell Solicitors and only for the purpose of dealing with your enquiry.
See full privacy policy.

Looking to see if you're eligible?

Get in touch for free legal advice

0808 159 7699

Call today to speak to an expert

OR
Start your claim

What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Friendly professional service.

"Excellent service all way through."

Sakina begum

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Thrilled

"After not knowing what to do, hudgell have helped me thoroughly through the process and… "

Adam Shutt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

helpful informative efficient and…

"helpful informative efficient and friendly these are all the qualities I found with the firm… "

Sharon Coultas

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

it took a long time but i definitely…

"it took a long time but i definitely got the result i wanted and deserved… "

Jan Mack

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very good efficient service

"Very good efficient service"

Amelia Jacobs

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service throughout my case

"Excellent service throughout my case Handled with ease and quickly"

Wayne Carter

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service in difficult…

"Excellent service in difficult circumstances Secured my compensation and won my case when other solicitors… "

Michael

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Fantastic team & Sarah :)

"Fantastic team and Sarah my Solicitor! Sarah has Handled everything for me, right up until… "

Sibel Sibel

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Third time lucky thanks to Hudgell!

"I had breast augmentation surgery three years ago for a complex assymetry case. I was… "

Bethanie Hawkins

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great customer service

"Great customer service Tasmin was very helpful Updated me on a regular basis Thanks for… "

Mr D Scannell

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Caroline was great in handling my case

"Caroline was great in handling my case, very informative and always kept me up to… "

Mr Richard Brook

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Dispute with EasyJet

"Although Hudgell offices were not local to us, there was no need for concern, as… "

Glyn

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Always on the ball

"Always on the ball! Great at what they do, very professional and fast with a… "

CHRISTOPHER CURTIS

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service. Very happy with result. Thank you."

Miss Erika Panakova

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Was an easy process and the caseworker…

"Was an easy process and the caseworker was very informative and very knowledgeable on my… "

Rachel Fee

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Lovely business to deal with

"Lovely business to deal with. Would recommend to anyone."

Mrs Kelly Byrnes

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great communication

"Great communication! My solicitor was lovely to deal with, open and listened to me."

Sue Ockendon

Rated 9.1 out of 10 based on 467 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

Our offices

London

55 Fleet Street
EC4Y 1JU

VIEW DETAILS

Hull

No 2 @ The Dock
46 Humber Street
HU1 1TU

VIEW DETAILS

Leeds

10 Park Place
Leeds
LS1 2RU

VIEW DETAILS

Manchester

1 St Peter’s Square
Third Floor
Manchester
M2 3AE

 

VIEW DETAILS

© 2019 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90