01482 778 463

We're here to help 01482 778 463

CLAIM ONLINE
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | Myles Bradbury case – why we welcomed restructuring of sentence to protect public

Myles Bradbury case – why we welcomed restructuring of sentence to protect public

Myles Bradbury


By Renu Daly, clinical negligence solicitor

What makes for an appropriate punishment for somebody who took advantage of their position of trust as a respected children’s doctor to sexually abuse 18 young boys in his care for a number of years?

Initially, Judge Gareth Hawkesworth decided it should be a total of 22 years when sentencing Cambridgeshire doctor Myles Bradbury last December, following four-and-a-half years of offending in his specialist role at Addenbrooke’s Hospital.

The judge at the time said he had never come across a ‘more culpable or grave course of sexual criminality which had involved such a gross and grotesque breach and betrayal of the Hippocratic oath’ – handing out the severe sentence which was welcomed by victims and their families.

However, following an appeal by Bradbury against the sentence, a panel of three Court of Appeal Judges this week made the decision to ‘restructure’ the sentence, replacing it with a custodial element of 16 years, with an additional six years on licence.

This move was the cue for inaccurate headlines across the national media about Bradbury winning a ‘six year cut in sentence’.

Of course, it resulted in immediate calls to myself from journalists seeking the families of victims – a large number of whom we represent – looking for comments of outrage and disappointment.

As we stressed in our statement following the appeal hearing, yes, families were disappointed and angry that Bradbury even had the nerve to sit in a court room and appeal. He has not shown any remorse and had already put their families, and the gravely ill young boys through suffering from which many may not recover psychologically.

As lawyers representing these vulnerable victims, it is our place to ensure we fully explain the law, in plain English to our clients, so they fully understand what has happened.

We also feel it is important the wider public fully understand the decision made, and in this case, the ‘restructuring’ of Bradbury’s sentence was something we welcomed.

Previously, Bradbury had a determinate sentence, which is for a fixed length of time. Where the sentence is of 12 months or more, the offender spends the first half of the sentence in prison and the second half in the community ‘on licence’.

Under the previous statutory sentence, Bradbury would have served half his 22 year sentence – 11 years – before he would have been ‘eligible’ for release back into the community. He would have remained on licence for the remaining 11 years of the initial sentence, and would be immediately returned to prison should he offend again.

However, a sentence should always be about best protecting the public, and effectively, under the initial sentence, the threat of re-offending could have still have been very significant when Bradbury reached his 11 years term, and was able to walk free.

The Court of Appeal restructured the sentence to an ‘indeterminate’ 16-year sentence, with six years on licence.

With an ‘indeterminate’ prison sentence, there is no date is set when the person will be released.

They have to spend a minimum amount of time in prison (called a ‘tariff’) before they’re considered for release, with The Parole Board responsible for deciding if someone can be released.

Indeterminate sentences are given if a court thinks an offender is a danger to the public, and by sentencing him in this way, Bradbury’s character and behaviour will be under constant scrutiny.

He will serve two-thirds of the sentence – 10 years and 8 months – before importantly he is not ‘eligible’ `for release, but only ‘considered’ for release on licence, and here lies the key difference between the two sentences, as it provides greater protection to the public.

It means the courts have recognised this is a man who, after serving 11 years, may not have changed at all. He may have served his sentence, but he could remain a major threat to young children and could be highly likely to reoffend. If that were to be the case, his sentence would have done no good at all.

Under the ‘indeterminate sentence’, he will be assessed thoroughly, with his behaviour, his remorsefulness and his mental state closely assessed.

Under this system, the public will simply be much better protected.

If it is considered at the time that he is of any danger to the public, and young children in particular, he will remain in prison for the rest of his sentence – and if still a danger, his sentence could be amended again accordingly.

Under this approach, Bradbury won’t be released at all if still considered a threat, and that has to be the key consideration at all times.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

The Author

author image

Renu Daly

Solicitor, London

rd@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request a callback from a solicitor

 I am an existing client.









What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hiya you work real good for me I'm …

"Hiya you work real good for me I'm happy for you do for me and… "

Ms Anne Ollier

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service. I have been kept informed every step of the way. When I have… "

maggie ackroyd

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service, the Solicitor kept me informed on all progress with regular phone calls and… "

Miss Rebecca Shaw

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Would 100% recommend and use again

"Whilst having to deal with a difficult company who was denying I ever worked for… "

Danny Morfitt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Fantastic service from beginning to …

"Fantastic service from beginning to end. Cant really say much more than that."

Craig

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

My case

"I have always found your service very good,always up to date with what was going… "

Miss Julie johnson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great service

"Great service, friendly and hard working staff"

Mr Mohamed Jaouadi

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent customer care

"Once my claim was accepted I was kept informed throughout the negotiating process very professional… "

Mr Terence John Casey

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent Company

"Fast, friendly and honest service. Could not be happier with how my claim was handled… "

Miss Stacie King

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very prompt along every step of the way

"Very prompt along every step of the way"

Miss Rachel Victoria Joseph

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service. Regular updates on my case and felt they had my best interests in… "

Mr Paul Hewson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell's have been very sensitive and …

"Hudgell's have been very sensitive and thorough with their support of me in my case.… "

Mrs Lisa Russell

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

excellent

"made my claim so easy and straight forward kept me updated and organised everything thank… "

Miss Sian Clarke

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Highly Recommend

"Cannot recommend enough. Informative all the way through and always honest. Never a problem to… "

Miss P

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent I would recommend to anyone

"Excellent ,Very happy with the out come ,will use this company again."

Mr Darren Paul Greaves

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent friendly service

"I always felt Samantha was working for me, all my questions were answered in a… "

Tony Squires

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very happy

"My case was dealt with very well and I was kept upto date with everything… "

Mr Glen Harrison

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Medical Negligence Claim

"My claim was initially lodged with a firm of solicitors but was later transferred to… "

Mr. Shepherd

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Professional and caring.

"I find them helpful and honest.I would definitely recommend them."

Mr Michael Grundy

Rated 9.2 out of 10 based on 290 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

© 2017 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90