01482 778 463

We're here to help 01482 778 463

CLAIM ONLINE
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | Myles Bradbury case – why we welcomed restructuring of sentence to protect public

Myles Bradbury case – why we welcomed restructuring of sentence to protect public

Myles Bradbury


By Renu Daly, clinical negligence solicitor

What makes for an appropriate punishment for somebody who took advantage of their position of trust as a respected children’s doctor to sexually abuse 18 young boys in his care for a number of years?

Initially, Judge Gareth Hawkesworth decided it should be a total of 22 years when sentencing Cambridgeshire doctor Myles Bradbury last December, following four-and-a-half years of offending in his specialist role at Addenbrooke’s Hospital.

The judge at the time said he had never come across a ‘more culpable or grave course of sexual criminality which had involved such a gross and grotesque breach and betrayal of the Hippocratic oath’ – handing out the severe sentence which was welcomed by victims and their families.

However, following an appeal by Bradbury against the sentence, a panel of three Court of Appeal Judges this week made the decision to ‘restructure’ the sentence, replacing it with a custodial element of 16 years, with an additional six years on licence.

This move was the cue for inaccurate headlines across the national media about Bradbury winning a ‘six year cut in sentence’.

Of course, it resulted in immediate calls to myself from journalists seeking the families of victims – a large number of whom we represent – looking for comments of outrage and disappointment.

As we stressed in our statement following the appeal hearing, yes, families were disappointed and angry that Bradbury even had the nerve to sit in a court room and appeal. He has not shown any remorse and had already put their families, and the gravely ill young boys through suffering from which many may not recover psychologically.

As lawyers representing these vulnerable victims, it is our place to ensure we fully explain the law, in plain English to our clients, so they fully understand what has happened.

We also feel it is important the wider public fully understand the decision made, and in this case, the ‘restructuring’ of Bradbury’s sentence was something we welcomed.

Previously, Bradbury had a determinate sentence, which is for a fixed length of time. Where the sentence is of 12 months or more, the offender spends the first half of the sentence in prison and the second half in the community ‘on licence’.

Under the previous statutory sentence, Bradbury would have served half his 22 year sentence – 11 years – before he would have been ‘eligible’ for release back into the community. He would have remained on licence for the remaining 11 years of the initial sentence, and would be immediately returned to prison should he offend again.

However, a sentence should always be about best protecting the public, and effectively, under the initial sentence, the threat of re-offending could have still have been very significant when Bradbury reached his 11 years term, and was able to walk free.

The Court of Appeal restructured the sentence to an ‘indeterminate’ 16-year sentence, with six years on licence.

With an ‘indeterminate’ prison sentence, there is no date is set when the person will be released.

They have to spend a minimum amount of time in prison (called a ‘tariff’) before they’re considered for release, with The Parole Board responsible for deciding if someone can be released.

Indeterminate sentences are given if a court thinks an offender is a danger to the public, and by sentencing him in this way, Bradbury’s character and behaviour will be under constant scrutiny.

He will serve two-thirds of the sentence – 10 years and 8 months – before importantly he is not ‘eligible’ `for release, but only ‘considered’ for release on licence, and here lies the key difference between the two sentences, as it provides greater protection to the public.

It means the courts have recognised this is a man who, after serving 11 years, may not have changed at all. He may have served his sentence, but he could remain a major threat to young children and could be highly likely to reoffend. If that were to be the case, his sentence would have done no good at all.

Under the ‘indeterminate sentence’, he will be assessed thoroughly, with his behaviour, his remorsefulness and his mental state closely assessed.

Under this system, the public will simply be much better protected.

If it is considered at the time that he is of any danger to the public, and young children in particular, he will remain in prison for the rest of his sentence – and if still a danger, his sentence could be amended again accordingly.

Under this approach, Bradbury won’t be released at all if still considered a threat, and that has to be the key consideration at all times.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

The Author

author image

Renu Daly

Solicitor, Clinical Negligence

rd@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request a callback from a solicitor

 I am an existing client.









What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I would recommend this company to …

"I would recommend this company to anyone very helpful and quick they kept me up… "

Mrs Clare Kett

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Impeccable service and results

"Impeccable service and results, very informative & helpful, thank you for everything!"

Miss Isabelle Jowett

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Professional and helpful service

"Found the service and advice from my contact at Hudgell to be very professional and… "

Sue

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

1st class service …

"I can not fault them kepted me up to date with what was going on… "

Mr Mark Ward

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Thank you very much for your help with …

"Thank you very much for your help with sorting my case against London Police. Very… "

Mr Greg K.

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I found Hudgell Solicitors to be absolutel professionals

"I found Hudgell Solicitors to be professional from start to finish, helpful, approachable and honest… "

Vanessa T

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

genuine caring company honest and …

"genuine caring company honest and sincere I would recommend them highly"

customer

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very happy with the fast service I have …

"Very happy with the fast service I have received would 100% recommend and use again"

Mrs Gemma Welburn

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

i must say they have handled my case

"i must say they have handled my case, amazingly well!!!. i would very much recommend… "

Mr Fahad Ali

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

After starting my case with rapid …

"After starting my case with rapid solicitors, Hudgell took over the company, there was minimal… "

Mr Alan Scott Foster

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

My claim looked like it was going to be …

"My claim looked like it was going to be dragged out and the other party… "

shelley bond

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great from start to finish.

"Great from start to finish. The staff are Very friendly professional and helpful and kept… "

Mr Darren Barnes

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

We have recently used Hudgell …for a negligence claim

"We have recently used Hudgell Solicitors for a negligence claim.The way that dealt with a… "

Mrs Rosemary Joynes

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Extremely professional and efficient

"Extremely professional and efficient. Every effort was made to guide us through the process and… "

SMK

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Good result although process was a …

"Good result although process was a little long winded considering the other party was totally… "

Mrs Elizabeth Ryan

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Ihad the need to use a solicitor i had …

"Ihad the need to use a solicitor i had never heard of HUDGELL SOLICITORS at… "

Tina Dridge

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I am satisfied,profesional service ,I …

"I am satisfied,profesional service ,I recommend to everyone."

Miss Stanislawa Szczubelek

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very good polite and fast service

"Very good polite and fast service"

Lesley Hubbard

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell's did a good job

"Nasreen did a good job and Hudgell's were great throughout"

AJV2017

Rated 9.2 out of 10 based on 313 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

© 2017 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90