01482 778 463
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | Court of Appeal confirms CFAs can be validly transferred

Court of Appeal confirms CFAs can be validly transferred

Neil Hudgell


A conditional fee agreement (CFA) can be validly transferred from one law firm to another, the Court of Appeal ruled today in what has been described as the most important costs decision since the Jackson reforms were introduced.

Specialist personal injury law firm Hudgell acted for the claimant in Budana v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, a test case that was leapfrogged to the appeal court in the wake of several conflicting decisions in the lower courts.

In Budana, District Judge Besford held that the CFA was not validly assigned from Baker Rees to Hudgell, as the agreement had been terminated prior to the assignment when Baker Rees closed its personal injury practice. The purported assignment occurred just days before the Jackson reforms came into force on 1 April 2013, but the client did not confirm her consent to it until afterwards.

The Law Society, which intervened in the appeal, estimated that there could be tens of thousands of clients affected by this issue given the similar impact of the Jackson reforms on smaller law firms. Hudgell has led the way in transferring personal injury files from firms leaving the sector through its innovative Webuyanyfiles.com website.

Giving the lead judgment in the Court of Appeal, Lady Justice Gloster found that DJ Besford had erred in finding that the Baker Rees CFA had been terminated.

The key issue was whether the claimant was entitled to recover a success fee under a CFA entered into before 1 April 2013 – such recovery was banned for cases starting on or after that date.

Gloster LJ said: “There is no reason in principle why rights and benefits [her emphasis] under a firm of solicitors’ contracts with its clients, or its books of business, should not be capable of assignment in today’s business environment.”

She ruled that, rather than an assignment, there had been a novation – a new contract – under which the client agreed to transfer the rights and obligations of Baker Rees to Hudgell and that the correct interpretation of section 44(6) of LASPO meant the original success fee payable under the Baker Rees CFA was still enforceable.

Gloster LJ said: “It is clear… that, objectively construed, the intention of the parties was that Hudgell should simply be substituted in Baker Rees’s place… under and subject to the same terms of the existing (and so far as the parties were concerned, at least) continuing retainer…

“[It would be] an over-technical application of the doctrine of novation so as to prevent any litigant, who had begun a claim under a CFA prior to 1 April 2013, from recovering costs in respect of a success fee, simply because a novation had occurred as a result of a change in the constitution of the firm of solicitors acting for her, or as a result of the conduct of her claim being transferred, for whatever reason, to a new firm of solicitors.”

Lord Justice Beatson agreed, but Lord Justice Davis, though also allowing the appeal, found that there had been an assignment, rather than a novation.

He said: “If the parties to an agreement expressly agree in it that one party may assign both the benefits and the obligations of performing the contract to another, then in my opinion there can be no legal objection to the efficacy of such an assignment.”

He added: “An overall conclusion in favour of the defendant would appeal to no sense of the merits… It would mean that the defendant is absolved from paying those costs by virtue of adventitious technicality”.

The case will now return to the county court to consider the continuing dispute over the level of costs claimed by Hudgell.

Neil Hudgell, Managing Director of Hudgell, said: “The Court of Appeal has delivered an eminently sensible decision that brings certainty to law firms up and down the country which have come to the aid of clients who needed solicitors to take over their cases.

“It is regrettable, to say the least, that defendants are returning to the bad old days of the ‘costs war’ and taking technical points in a bid to escape their liability for costs. The Court of Appeal has sent a strong message today that it does not like that approach.”

Law Society President Joe Egan said: “I am delighted the Law Society was able to throw its weight behind this important case. Today’s ruling will affect many thousands of people who, following the removal of legal aid for the bulk of personal injury claims, needed to rely on ‘no win no fee’ agreements to pursue their cases.

“Our contribution to the case has been to emphasise the pernicious impact of a loophole in the law which hit many vulnerable litigants.”

Nicholas Bacon QC of 4 New Square, who led the claimant’s appeal in the Court of Appeal, described the decision as “probably the most significant costs case post Jackson.

He said: “It brings to an end years of uncertainty over the assignment of solicitors’ retainers and legitimatises the transfer arrangements which were deployed in the case and thousands of others.

“It is a tremendous victory for the solicitors’ profession and indeed for those members of the Bar whose fees were caught up in the assignment arguments up and down the country.”

You can  view the decision on the England and Wales Court of Appeal Decisions web site.

Related News:

Litigation Futures 

Law Gazette 

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

The Author

author image

Dr Neil Hudgell

Senior Solicitor, Managing Director

nmh@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request a callback from a solicitor

 I am an existing client.









Looking to see if you're eligible?

Get in touch for free legal advice

0808 159 7699

Call today to speak to an expert

OR
Start your claim

What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very happy with the fast service…

"Very happy with the fast service provided by Lauren at this firm. Always there to… "

Emma

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Made it very easy

"Made it very easy"

Mr Connor Robson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Really good service!

"Really good service!"

Mr Tharsan Uthayaseelan

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Good Experience

"Very good experience with this firm and my excellent lawyer, definitely a firm I will… "

Ms Asha Joyce

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Highly recommended,very helpful and…

"Highly recommended,very helpful and good customer service, they are a company that really care and… "

Mr Robert Edward Palmer

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Rebecca Cone looked after my claim and…

"Rebecca Cone looked after my claim and I would like to say that she was… "

Anthony Lyell

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell Solicitors

"Hudgell Solicitors. Was very helpful in dealing with my case. With the road accident I… "

Mr Anthony Navier

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell Solicitors dealt with our dental negligence claim

"Hudgell Solicitors dealt with our claim very professionally, keeping us up to date at every… "

Fiona lamb

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great service

"Great service"

Mr Ian James Bedingfield

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

was very good and deal with my case

"was very good and deal with my case"

Miss Diane Rastall

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Amazing service, would definitely recommend 😊

"Amazing service in all aspects of my case and very understanding of the situation. Made… "

Miss Laura Delaney

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service would use again

"Excellent service would use again"

Mrs Debbie Morrison

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent Service

"Sam Thompson provided an excellent professional service in my medical negligence claim. Hudgell's kept me… "

HS

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Good efficient service by Sara Kidd

"Good efficient service by Sara Kidd. Thank you."

Mrs M

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

1st class service

"Excellent service throughout the process. Always kept me informed of developments by phone or post.… "

Miss Claire Milburn

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgells solicitors a sure win

"I would certainly recommend hudgells solicitors to anyone wanting to file a claim for medical/dental… "

Joanne Pendlebury

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I would definitely recommend Hudgell …

"I would definitely recommend Hudgell Solicitors to family and friends. My family”s whole experience from… "

Allison Kienlen

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I have found the service to be Excellent

"I have found the service to be excellent, always return calls & emails promptly &… "

Mr Simon Hunt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

5 Star Service at Hudgell Solicitors…

"Hudgell solicitors looked after my case, they listened and provided great support and help through… "

Mrs Veronica Stephenson

Rated 9.3 out of 10 based on 411 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

Our offices

London

55 Fleet Street
EC4Y 1JU

VIEW DETAILS

Hull

No 2 @ The Dock
46 Humber Street
HU1 1TU

VIEW DETAILS

Leeds

10 Park Place
Leeds
LS1 2RU

VIEW DETAILS

© 2018 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90