01482 778 463
Client Focussed
No Win No Fee
Specialist Legal Teams
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | Error which saw Gloucestershire police identify child abuse victims could be hugely damaging and prevent others coming forward

Error which saw Gloucestershire police identify child abuse victims could be hugely damaging and prevent others coming forward

worried man


As a victim of abuse or any sexual crime those who come forward or are involved in any form of police investigation are protected by anonymity.

It is protection provided by the law which is crucial in giving people the confidence to come forward and speak about what has happened to them, be it a recently committed crime, or something that happened years ago.

In our work at Hudgell Solicitors, our specialist solicitors support many who have been abused or sexually assaulted in their lives and we know they need 100 per cent confidence in the people they entrust with the details of what happened to them.

They need 100 per cent trust they will be protected, and not let down again.

This makes the news of Gloucestershire police mistakenly sending out a bulk email to 56 people which identified multiple alleged victims of historical child abuse both shocking and saddening.

The message it sends out is not one of trust but of a lack of care, and that could be hugely damaging and something which may well prevent other victims of abuse from speaking about what has happened to them.

Serious errors caused by police forces failing to follow basic standards

The error was made by one officer when sending an update on the case by email in December 2016. He entered the addresses of the recipients in the “To” field and did not use the “bcc” (blind carbon copy) function, which would have hidden identities.

Each recipient of the e-mail, which reportedly may have included lawyers and journalists as well as victims and witnesses – could see both e-mail addresses and full names of the others. Schools and other organisations being investigated were also named.

However, although the error was that of an individual, who was referred by the force to the professional standards department, I firmly believe such mistakes only happen due to a lack of thorough procedures, processes and accountability across many of our police forces today.

This is highlighted in the fact that at the time of this data breach, the “bcc” field was not a function automatically selected on the email software of Gloucestershire police.  Staff members had to adjust their own settings to be able to use this function when sending out bulk emails on sensitive investigations.

The force was also found to have failed to provide staff with any – or any adequate – guidance or training on bulk email communication.

Given the known risks of sending of bulk emails – in any working environment – this was effectively a disaster waiting to happen and suggests a complete disregard as to the importance of protecting the rights of those they serve when investigating such serious alleged crimes.

Force’s decision to appeal £80,000 fine is shocking response

The force has rightly been fined £80,000 by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which said the error was likely to have caused “substantial distress” to alleged abuse victims.

Yet rather than accept the huge significance of this error and focus its efforts on learning lessons and making changes to prevent it ever happening again, Gloucestershire police has said it is considering an appeal, as it says the email message was not sent to journalists and lawyers, as the ICO said.

This is irrelevant, as the issue is not who received the details, it is the fact that they received their personal details at all.

I find this a truly shocking response from the force and is certainly not something which suggests it is holding up its hands and accepting its wrongdoing, or carrying out a thorough review of processes to ensure it is not repeated.

Sadly, this is not an isolated case.

Earlier this year, Humberside Police was fined £130,000 after losing the recorded interview of an alleged rape victim, a woman we are now representing in a legal claim against the force.

The highly sensitive information, which was contained in an envelope and not protected, was left on a police officer’s desk and went missing. It had been due to be posted to Cleveland Police but never arrived, and due to substandard audit trails at the force, it was not even known if it was ever posted as intended.

This woman has completely lost her confidence in the police and legal system as a result.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

The Author

author image

Andrew Petherbridge

Lawyer and Head of Civil Liberties

ap@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request A Callback

I am an existing client.










Or call us FREE on:

01482 778 463


trust pilottrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot star

The data you submit will only be used by Hudgell Solicitors and only for the purpose of dealing with your enquiry.
See full privacy policy.

Looking to see if you're eligible?

Get in touch for free legal advice

0808 159 7699

Call today to speak to an expert

OR
Start your claim

What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Friendly professional service.

"Excellent service all way through."

Sakina begum

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Thrilled

"After not knowing what to do, hudgell have helped me thoroughly through the process and… "

Adam Shutt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

helpful informative efficient and…

"helpful informative efficient and friendly these are all the qualities I found with the firm… "

Sharon Coultas

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

it took a long time but i definitely…

"it took a long time but i definitely got the result i wanted and deserved… "

Jan Mack

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very good efficient service

"Very good efficient service"

Amelia Jacobs

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service throughout my case

"Excellent service throughout my case Handled with ease and quickly"

Wayne Carter

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service in difficult…

"Excellent service in difficult circumstances Secured my compensation and won my case when other solicitors… "

Michael

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Fantastic team & Sarah :)

"Fantastic team and Sarah my Solicitor! Sarah has Handled everything for me, right up until… "

Sibel Sibel

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Third time lucky thanks to Hudgell!

"I had breast augmentation surgery three years ago for a complex assymetry case. I was… "

Bethanie Hawkins

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great customer service

"Great customer service Tasmin was very helpful Updated me on a regular basis Thanks for… "

Mr D Scannell

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Caroline was great in handling my case

"Caroline was great in handling my case, very informative and always kept me up to… "

Mr Richard Brook

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Dispute with EasyJet

"Although Hudgell offices were not local to us, there was no need for concern, as… "

Glyn

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Always on the ball

"Always on the ball! Great at what they do, very professional and fast with a… "

CHRISTOPHER CURTIS

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service

"Excellent service. Very happy with result. Thank you."

Miss Erika Panakova

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Was an easy process and the caseworker…

"Was an easy process and the caseworker was very informative and very knowledgeable on my… "

Rachel Fee

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Lovely business to deal with

"Lovely business to deal with. Would recommend to anyone."

Mrs Kelly Byrnes

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great communication

"Great communication! My solicitor was lovely to deal with, open and listened to me."

Sue Ockendon

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very happy with how they managed my…

"Very happy with how they managed my claim. I would recommend them."

Mr Steve Roberts

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very helpful and truly understanding in…

"Very helpful and truly understanding in a very sensitive case would highly recommend to anyone"

Miss Sarah Morris

Rated 9.4 out of 10 based on 465 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

Our offices

London

55 Fleet Street
EC4Y 1JU

VIEW DETAILS

Hull

No 2 @ The Dock
46 Humber Street
HU1 1TU

VIEW DETAILS

Leeds

10 Park Place
Leeds
LS1 2RU

VIEW DETAILS

Manchester

1 St Peter’s Square
Third Floor
Manchester
M2 3AE

 

VIEW DETAILS

© 2018 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90