01482 778 463

We're here to help 01482 778 463

CLAIM ONLINE
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | Computer intelligence is a step forward but should never replace subjective decisions made by police officers on holding suspects

Computer intelligence is a step forward but should never replace subjective decisions made by police officers on holding suspects

Police Cell


It has been interesting to read that police in Durham are preparing to introduce an artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to help officers decide whether or not a suspect should be retained in custody.

The Data for the Harm Assessment Risk Tool (Hart) classifies suspects as being of low, medium or high risk of offending.

It was tested in 2013 by using police records of offending history between 2008 and 2012 to see how accurate it was in predicting whether suspects would offend or not over the next two years.

Sheena Urwin, head of criminal justice at Durham Constabulary, has said the system is likely to be used by officers at the force in the ‘next two to three months’.

It could therefore be used when deciding whether to keep a suspect in custody for a few more hours, whether to release them on bail before a charge, or, after a charge has been made, whether to remand them in custody.

System has proved accurate – but there are concerns over potential to wrongly detain suspects

There can be no denying that the system proved to be highly accurate during the testing period, with forecasts that a suspect was low risk turning out to be accurate 98 per cent of the time, while forecasts they were high risk accurate 88 per cent of the time.

However, although these stats look impressive, given my role in supporting victims of wrongful arrest and unlawful detention at Hudgell Solicitors, I have concerns over 12 per cent of suspects wrongly being assessed as ‘high risk’.

If considered using this Hart score alone, there would certainly be a danger of holding a suspect in custody, when in fact, they could be proved completely innocent and no threat to committing further crime.

It is also being reported that the software has been designed to be more likely to classify someone as medium or high risk, therefore erring on the side of caution to avoid releasing suspects who may commit a crime.

In my opinion, it is a dangerous move to introduce a system which is influenced in any way to reach a certain conclusion. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Police forces must have a genuine reason for arresting a person and then detaining them in custody, and they must follow set procedures to stay within the law themselves.

If people are held for longer than appropriate, it can be unlawful imprisonment, so this technology, particularly given what has been revealed, must be used with caution.

Recommendations must be carefully considered, and impact of system must be scrutinised

The introduction of Hart as a system for officers to use is being described as a ‘live experiment’, and officers will only use the system in a random selection of cases, so that its impact can be compared to what happens when it is not used.

Its developers have been keen to stress it will be used in an “advisory” role, and should not remove discretion from the police officer using it.

That will be key in ensuring mistakes are not made, as no matter what volume of stats and data are available to a piece of software – no matter how advanced – it will never match the subjective, informed and knowledgeable view of experienced police officers.

Ms Urwin has said that suspects with no offending history would be less likely to be classed as high risk by Hart, though if they were arrested on suspicion of a very serious crime such as murder, it would have an “impact” on the output.

In such a case, computer software would surely be at a huge disadvantage to the officers involved in investigating the offences and benefitting from being aware of continually updating evidence on the case, and speaking to witnesses.

Helen Ryan, head of law at the University of Winchester, has described Hart as “incredibly interesting” in principle, saying that ‘potentially, machines can be far more accurate – given the right data – than humans.”

That is something yet to be proved, and until that is the case, it should be used with caution, and only one aspect influencing decisions over detentions of suspects.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

The Author

author image

Andrew Petherbridge

Team Supervisor and Chartered Legal Executive, Civil Liberties

ap@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request a callback from a solicitor

 I am an existing client.









What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I would recommend this company to …

"I would recommend this company to anyone very helpful and quick they kept me up… "

Mrs Clare Kett

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Impeccable service and results

"Impeccable service and results, very informative & helpful, thank you for everything!"

Miss Isabelle Jowett

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Professional and helpful service

"Found the service and advice from my contact at Hudgell to be very professional and… "

Sue

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

1st class service …

"I can not fault them kepted me up to date with what was going on… "

Mr Mark Ward

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Thank you very much for your help with …

"Thank you very much for your help with sorting my case against London Police. Very… "

Mr Greg K.

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I found Hudgell Solicitors to be absolutel professionals

"I found Hudgell Solicitors to be professional from start to finish, helpful, approachable and honest… "

Vanessa T

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

genuine caring company honest and …

"genuine caring company honest and sincere I would recommend them highly"

customer

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very happy with the fast service I have …

"Very happy with the fast service I have received would 100% recommend and use again"

Mrs Gemma Welburn

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

i must say they have handled my case

"i must say they have handled my case, amazingly well!!!. i would very much recommend… "

Mr Fahad Ali

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

After starting my case with rapid …

"After starting my case with rapid solicitors, Hudgell took over the company, there was minimal… "

Mr Alan Scott Foster

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

My claim looked like it was going to be …

"My claim looked like it was going to be dragged out and the other party… "

shelley bond

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great from start to finish.

"Great from start to finish. The staff are Very friendly professional and helpful and kept… "

Mr Darren Barnes

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

We have recently used Hudgell …for a negligence claim

"We have recently used Hudgell Solicitors for a negligence claim.The way that dealt with a… "

Mrs Rosemary Joynes

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Extremely professional and efficient

"Extremely professional and efficient. Every effort was made to guide us through the process and… "

SMK

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Good result although process was a …

"Good result although process was a little long winded considering the other party was totally… "

Mrs Elizabeth Ryan

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Ihad the need to use a solicitor i had …

"Ihad the need to use a solicitor i had never heard of HUDGELL SOLICITORS at… "

Tina Dridge

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I am satisfied,profesional service ,I …

"I am satisfied,profesional service ,I recommend to everyone."

Miss Stanislawa Szczubelek

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very good polite and fast service

"Very good polite and fast service"

Lesley Hubbard

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell's did a good job

"Nasreen did a good job and Hudgell's were great throughout"

AJV2017

Rated 9.2 out of 10 based on 313 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

© 2017 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90