01482 778 463
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Latest News | Computer intelligence is a step forward but should never replace subjective decisions made by police officers on holding suspects

Computer intelligence is a step forward but should never replace subjective decisions made by police officers on holding suspects

Police Cell


It has been interesting to read that police in Durham are preparing to introduce an artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to help officers decide whether or not a suspect should be retained in custody.

The Data for the Harm Assessment Risk Tool (Hart) classifies suspects as being of low, medium or high risk of offending.

It was tested in 2013 by using police records of offending history between 2008 and 2012 to see how accurate it was in predicting whether suspects would offend or not over the next two years.

Sheena Urwin, head of criminal justice at Durham Constabulary, has said the system is likely to be used by officers at the force in the ‘next two to three months’.

It could therefore be used when deciding whether to keep a suspect in custody for a few more hours, whether to release them on bail before a charge, or, after a charge has been made, whether to remand them in custody.

System has proved accurate – but there are concerns over potential to wrongly detain suspects

There can be no denying that the system proved to be highly accurate during the testing period, with forecasts that a suspect was low risk turning out to be accurate 98 per cent of the time, while forecasts they were high risk accurate 88 per cent of the time.

However, although these stats look impressive, given my role in supporting victims of wrongful arrest and unlawful detention at Hudgell Solicitors, I have concerns over 12 per cent of suspects wrongly being assessed as ‘high risk’.

If considered using this Hart score alone, there would certainly be a danger of holding a suspect in custody, when in fact, they could be proved completely innocent and no threat to committing further crime.

It is also being reported that the software has been designed to be more likely to classify someone as medium or high risk, therefore erring on the side of caution to avoid releasing suspects who may commit a crime.

In my opinion, it is a dangerous move to introduce a system which is influenced in any way to reach a certain conclusion. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Police forces must have a genuine reason for arresting a person and then detaining them in custody, and they must follow set procedures to stay within the law themselves.

If people are held for longer than appropriate, it can be unlawful imprisonment, so this technology, particularly given what has been revealed, must be used with caution.

Recommendations must be carefully considered, and impact of system must be scrutinised

The introduction of Hart as a system for officers to use is being described as a ‘live experiment’, and officers will only use the system in a random selection of cases, so that its impact can be compared to what happens when it is not used.

Its developers have been keen to stress it will be used in an “advisory” role, and should not remove discretion from the police officer using it.

That will be key in ensuring mistakes are not made, as no matter what volume of stats and data are available to a piece of software – no matter how advanced – it will never match the subjective, informed and knowledgeable view of experienced police officers.

Ms Urwin has said that suspects with no offending history would be less likely to be classed as high risk by Hart, though if they were arrested on suspicion of a very serious crime such as murder, it would have an “impact” on the output.

In such a case, computer software would surely be at a huge disadvantage to the officers involved in investigating the offences and benefitting from being aware of continually updating evidence on the case, and speaking to witnesses.

Helen Ryan, head of law at the University of Winchester, has described Hart as “incredibly interesting” in principle, saying that ‘potentially, machines can be far more accurate – given the right data – than humans.”

That is something yet to be proved, and until that is the case, it should be used with caution, and only one aspect influencing decisions over detentions of suspects.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

*Required

The Author

author image

Andrew Petherbridge

Team Supervisor and Chartered Legal Executive, Civil Liberties

ap@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request a callback from a solicitor

 I am an existing client.









Looking to see if you're eligible?

Get in touch for free legal advice

0808 159 7699

Call today to speak to an expert

OR
Start your claim

What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Good Experience

"Very good experience with this firm and my excellent lawyer, definitely a firm I will… "

Ms Asha Joyce

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Highly recommended,very helpful and…

"Highly recommended,very helpful and good customer service, they are a company that really care and… "

Mr Robert Edward Palmer

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Rebecca Cone looked after my claim and…

"Rebecca Cone looked after my claim and I would like to say that she was… "

Anthony Lyell

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell Solicitors

"Hudgell Solicitors. Was very helpful in dealing with my case. With the road accident I… "

Mr Anthony Navier

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgell Solicitors dealt with our dental negligence claim

"Hudgell Solicitors dealt with our claim very professionally, keeping us up to date at every… "

Fiona lamb

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great service

"Great service"

Mr Ian James Bedingfield

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

was very good and deal with my case

"was very good and deal with my case"

Miss Diane Rastall

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Amazing service, would definitely recommend 😊

"Amazing service in all aspects of my case and very understanding of the situation. Made… "

Miss Laura Delaney

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service would use again

"Excellent service would use again"

Mrs Debbie Morrison

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent Service

"Sam Thompson provided an excellent professional service in my medical negligence claim. Hudgell's kept me… "

HS

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Good efficient service by Sara Kidd

"Good efficient service by Sara Kidd. Thank you."

Mrs M

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

1st class service

"Excellent service throughout the process. Always kept me informed of developments by phone or post.… "

Miss Claire Milburn

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgells solicitors a sure win

"I would certainly recommend hudgells solicitors to anyone wanting to file a claim for medical/dental… "

Joanne Pendlebury

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I would definitely recommend Hudgell …

"I would definitely recommend Hudgell Solicitors to family and friends. My family”s whole experience from… "

Allison Kienlen

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I have found the service to be Excellent

"I have found the service to be excellent, always return calls & emails promptly &… "

Mr Simon Hunt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

5 Star Service at Hudgell Solicitors…

"Hudgell solicitors looked after my case, they listened and provided great support and help through… "

Mrs Veronica Stephenson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Would highly recommend

"Would highly recommend helped me with my case and was emailing me and sending me… "

Miss Collette Bache

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very professional and efficient

"Very professional and efficient, I'm 100%satisfied with every aspect.Would use them again in future and… "

lisa ,happy client

Rated 9.3 out of 10 based on 408 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

Our offices

London

55 Fleet Street
EC4Y 1JU

VIEW DETAILS

Hull

No 2 @ The Dock
46 Humber Street
HU1 1TU

VIEW DETAILS

Leeds

10 Park Place
Leeds
LS1 2RU

VIEW DETAILS

© 2018 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90