01482 778 463
Client Focussed
No Win No Fee
Specialist Legal Teams
Hudgell Solicitors™ | Case Stories | ‘Doctors delayed treating virus affecting my unborn baby girl and we lost her. It was all so avoidable’. A mother’s story of loss and her warning to others

‘Doctors delayed treating virus affecting my unborn baby girl and we lost her. It was all so avoidable’. A mother’s story of loss and her warning to others



When Laura Cuthbert’s son Nathan developed a rash on his cheeks and across his body, she was quick to act.

Knowing not only that she needed to have him assessed by a doctor, as she was 18 weeks into her second pregnancy, she knew the importance of speedy medical attention for herself also.

Having known someone who’d recently had a child with similar symptoms, she was aware the rash could have been caused by a virus known as slapped cheek syndrome (parvovirus), something which if caught by a pregnant mother in the first 20 weeks, can cause problems to an unborn baby.

At 18 weeks pregnant, Laura called NHS Direct for advice and was advised to see her GP the following morning, leading to her being sent for blood tests at Luton and Dunstable Hospital.

Four days later, on 30 November 2012, Laura and her partner, Steve, were given the worrying news that she had been infected. It meant their baby girl, to be called Chloe, was at risk.

Despite this concern, and somewhat to Laura and Steve’s surprise, there seemed to be a lack of urgency from those treating her. Rather than being immediately assessed, they were told she would be scanned and seen by a specialist consultant seven days later, on the date of her 20-week scan.

However, a Consultant Obstetrician didn’t carry out the scan on the day, as had been promised. Instead, the couple were told her notes would be checked afterwards.

The following day, on 12 December 2012, Laura was contacted and booked into a Fetal Medicine Clinic for an appointment – an appointment which due to the festive period approaching, would not be until the New Year – in another three weeks.

“I was worried. I was aware of the dangers and was concerned because my belly was growing a lot faster than it had with Nathan and I was exhausted all the time,” said Laura.

“Obviously I wondered whether it was just something which came with being pregnant, as every pregnancy is different, but I always had that worry from the moment I knew I’d got the infection, and things didn’t seem quite right.

“Obviously we were happy when we were told we were going to see the specialist at the 20 week scan, but on the day were told that was not the case and that a specialist would review my notes. We weren’t happy with that but the indication we were given was that everything was fine, and the reality is that you trust these people.

“We were told it would be two to three weeks before we were booked into the clinic and because of it being New Year, we would not be able to see the consultant until January, three weeks on. That did seem too long, but what can we do about it?”

img_0834

Delays in treatment led to heart-breaking loss of baby Chloe

When attending the clinic at Luton and Dunstable Hospital on 3 January 2013, the cost of those delays was heart-breaking.

Laura and Steve were told their baby girl was severely anaemic due to the loss of red blood cells, she had excess fluid on her lungs and needed a blood transfusion if she was to have any hope of survival – which was highly unlikely.

Tragically, Chloe didn’t make it through the transfusion and having attended at hospital that day looking forward to the year their baby girl was born, Laura and Steve found themselves having to cope with saying goodbye, without ever having said hello.

Telling of their experience during Baby Loss Awareness Week, which is encouraging people who have suffered the loss of babies to share their stories, Laura, 27, says she was concerned over the delays given she was aware of the possible dangers.

Although Laura and Steve, 28, did raise concerns that not enough was being done quickly enough, Laura says she would urge others to voice their concerns more strongly and demand tests and scans are done.

Almost four years on, Laura says she has mixed feelings of anger and frustration over the events which cost her daughter her life. She also carries regret that she didn’t challenge the medics more. As far as she was concerned, they were the experts and acting in her best interests.

“My message to any mother-to-be who has concerns would be to make sure you push and demand extra tests if you have any concerns at all. Don’t accept being told it will be ok to wait, especially if you are in a situation like I was and there has been an identified risk to your baby,” she said.

“You feel you can’t demand more, but you can. I wasn’t happy. I wouldn’t allow it again. It was all so avoidable.”

Laura, Steve and Nathan have since been joined by another new family member, Finley, who will soon celebrate his 3rd birthday in December 2016.

“I fell pregnant again just nine weeks after we lost Chloe and thankfully that pregnancy was straight forward and without complications,” Laura added.

“Unfortunately, I didn’t enjoy the pregnancy. I couldn’t because of all that had gone on before. I was only happy when Finley was born healthy and in my arms.

“We are angry because we know our daughter could have been saved had the medical teams acted as they should have. We wouldn’t be in this situation now and we would have our daughter here with us.”

img_0835

Failure to act quickly amounted to sub-standard care

Dimple Raja, a clinical negligence solicitor at Hudgell Solicitors, represented the family in a successful damages claim and says the failure to act quickly enough on a known danger amounted to sub-standard care.

She said: “National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that if a pregnant patient has confirmed exposure of parvovirus, then the patient should be referred to an Obstetrician for a fetal ultrasound scan and ongoing management within four weeks.

“That meant that Laura should have been seen by an Obstetrician or Fetal Medicine Consultant for an ultrasound scan before Christmas and not into the New Year. It was also negligent in that a Consultant Obstetrician with a specialism in fetal assessment scanning did not assess her at her 20-week scan.

“Had that happened, it is likely that abnormal results would have been spotted, which would have led to the transfusion being carried out prior to 23 weeks gestation, which has a much higher success rate.

“Independent experts we consulted as part of our investigations agreed that would have been likely to have led to Laura’s baby girl being born healthy. It is a very sad outcome and one which could have been avoided. Hopefully, lessons have been learned.”

Writing on behalf of the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, the NHS Litigation Authority admitted negligence and that baby Chloe would have survived had the transfusion being carried out earlier. A damages settlement was agreed with the family.

Charities involved in Baby Loss Awareness Week are hoping to break the taboo and make baby loss a much more openly talked about and discussed subject.

At 7pm on Saturday, 15 October 2016, people around the world will take part in the global ‘Wave of Light’, in which they light a candle and leave it burning for at least one hour to remember all babies that have died too soon.

The Author

author image

Dimple Raja

Solicitor, Clinical Negligence

dkr@hudgellsolicitors.co.uk

Request a callback

Request A Callback

I am an existing client.










Or call us FREE on:

01482 778 463


trust pilottrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot startrustpilot star

The data you submit will only be used by Hudgell Solicitors and only for the purpose of dealing with your enquiry.
See full privacy policy.

Looking to see if you're eligible?

Get in touch for free legal advice

0808 159 7699

Call today to speak to an expert

OR
Start your claim

What Our Clients Think

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great Service

"Hudgell Solicitors dealt with my case very quickly and effectively. The contact and communication was… "

Tracy

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Fantastic service

"Fantastic service, on the ball with everything and good outcome"

Hayley coleman

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very professional

"Very professional, took all the stress off my hands and very pleasant to deal with.… "

Steve

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Hudgsell’s were our insurers with…traffic accident in France - successful claim.

"Hudgsell’s were our insurers with regard to road traffic accidents occurring abroad, (France) we were… "

P. Nevitt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Always honest with there appraisal and…

"Always honest with there appraisal and willing to listen"

Tim Edge/

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Made the whole holiday illness claim…

"Made the whole holiday illness claim stress free. Updates given regularly- overall a pleasure to… "

Kate

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

I was fortunate to find Hudgell…

"I was fortunate to find Hudgell Solicitors after having an official complaint upheld. After I… "

James Henderson

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Great service

"Great service. Kept informed at all times. Good results"

ROY NAYLOR

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very professional and pleasant…

"Very professional and pleasant solicitors .. kept me up to date and was very prompt… "

Julie

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Recommended!

"Friendly, Helpful, and fair. Would recommend Hudgells to anyone I know."

Paul

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Friendly professional service.

"Excellent service all way through."

Sakina begum

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Thrilled

"After not knowing what to do, hudgell have helped me thoroughly through the process and… "

Adam Shutt

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

helpful informative efficient and…

"helpful informative efficient and friendly these are all the qualities I found with the firm… "

Sharon Coultas

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

it took a long time but i definitely…

"it took a long time but i definitely got the result i wanted and deserved… "

Jan Mack

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Very good efficient service

"Very good efficient service"

Amelia Jacobs

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service throughout my case

"Excellent service throughout my case Handled with ease and quickly"

Wayne Carter

trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star trustpilot-star

Excellent service in difficult…

"Excellent service in difficult circumstances Secured my compensation and won my case when other solicitors… "

Michael

Rated 9 out of 10 based on 477 reviews

Powered by Trustpilot

Our offices

London

55 Fleet Street
EC4Y 1JU
DX 437 Chancery Lane

VIEW DETAILS

Hull

No 2 @ The Dock
46 Humber Street
HU1 1TU
DX 11923 Hull

VIEW DETAILS

Leeds

10 Park Place
Leeds
LS1 2RU
DX 744770 Leeds 19

VIEW DETAILS

Manchester

1 St Peter’s Square
Third Floor
Manchester
M2 3AE

 

VIEW DETAILS

© 2019 Hudgell Solicitors®. All Rights Reserved.

Hudgell Solicitors is a trading name of Neil Hudgell Limited | Director Dr. Neil Hudgell MA LLB (Hons) LLD | Registered in England No. 7078429 | Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority | SRA No. 521372 | VAT Registration No. 254 7802 90