Medical Negligence

Hospital Trust agrees £1.2m damages settlement with patient who needed leg amputation after blood clotting following surgery

Man with prosthetic leg
michelle-tebbutt-hudgell-solicitors

Michelle Tebbutt

Team Leader & Senior Associate Solicitor

6 min read time

A hospital trust has agreed a £1.2m compensation settlement for a man who had to have his right leg amputated after developing blood clots following surgery.

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust admitted delays in referring the patient to its vascular surgery unit and agreed the damages settlement out of court.

Legal action was led by Hudgell Solicitors’ medical negligence specialists, in which it was alleged the delay meant an opportunity to prevent the amputation was missed.

The patient, who was 59 at the time and in full-time employment, had been admitted to Castle Hill Hospital in Cottingham on October 17, 2016, where he had scheduled surgery to remove a tumour from his bowel. The operation was a success, but the following day he began to suffer from numbness and pain in his right leg, and a coldness in his foot.

These were warning signs which lawyers alleged should have resulted in him being reviewed by a specialist immediately. Instead, a diagnosis of potential deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was made and the matter was handled ‘with a completely inappropriate lack of urgency,” said medical negligence solicitor Michelle Tebbutt.

Patient experienced ‘very best and worst standards of care’

No action was taken for three days, when the patient was transferred to Hull Royal Infirmary as an emergency for a duplex ultrasound scan, which examines the blood flow in the major arteries and veins in the arms and legs.

A diagnosis of ischaemic foot (lack of blood flow to the foot) was made and despite surgery the situation worsened over a matter of days, to the point where a decision was taken to carry out a below knee amputation. Due to further complications, including developing sepsis, a further operation was required to amputate above the knee.

“Our client benefitted from the very best, and the worst standards of care within a matter of 24 hours,” said Ms Tebbutt.

“The operation to remove the cancerous tumour was completed with success and he has lived free of his cancer returning since. However, by the time he left hospital, more than a month after that initial operation, he’d been through horrendous complications and undergone two amputations on his right leg, firstly below the knee, and then high up almost at the groin.

“It was our case, and an opinion supported by independent medical experts, that with the symptoms being displayed the day after our client’s operation, the possibility of a problem with blood flow and supply to the leg should have been considered immediately, and that had action been taken quickly enough, his leg could have been saved.”

Trust admitted breach of duty of care

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust admitted that a senior registrar should have been contacted on October 18 and that an assessment should have been carried out immediately and not delayed. It also admitted that, had a referral been made at that point, surgery would have been carried out in the early morning of October 19, two days earlier than it eventually was.

Although the Trust admitted the delays had surmounted to a breach of duty, they denied it had made a difference to the eventual outcome, saying it was their opinion that the delay had not ‘materially contributed to the need for amputations’.

Hudgell Solicitors instructed Howard Elgot, barrister at Parklane Plowden Chambers, to act on the case, supporting Ms Tebbutt in making the case for a damages settlement. The matter was set to be heard in court at trial in front of a judge, with the issue as to whether the delay had led to the need to amputate to be considered.

‘Your life changes forever when you lose a leg’

However, a settlement of £1.2m was agreed at a meeting between legal teams, a figure representing 60% of the total value of the case, if full liability had been admitted for causing the amputation.

“I’m glad the matter was sorted and I’m delighted with the settlement figure because it will enable us to sell our current home which is not suitable anymore, to buy a bungalow and not worry about bills in the future given I can no longer work and my wife has had to retire herself,” said the man, now 65.

“It has been bittersweet in many ways as I know I owe the doctors for what they did in saving my life with the treatment of my cancer, but nurses said to me that I would be back at work within three months.

“When I left hospital after a month I’d almost halved in weight and the amputation had denied me the opportunity of getting back on with my life, getting back to work and enjoying times with my family.

“We’ve children and grandchildren and it has impacted on what I can do with them, whilst me and my wife used to love walking and caravanning. We can’t do that now, and I really miss my work too. I know they denied being responsible for the amputation, but I think settling out of court says a lot.

“We are really grateful to Michelle Tebbutt at Hudgells. She kept us positive when I was finding things hard and when we were worried about the future. Every time we spoke to her she reassured us that we would make things better for the future.”

The man says he is still learning to live life as an amputee, but says he is positive about the future.

“Your life changes forever when you lose a leg. At the time of the amputation I was in pain and confused and I didn’t really take it in. I didn’t realise just how life would change. I still struggle now with my prosthetic, as it has been really difficult as my amputation ended so high because of the infections and difficulties.

“I have to go up and downstairs on my bottom, and I can’t do so much that I used to, but I have been going to the gym and playing wheelchair sports, so I am keeping myself active, and my wife is here to support me through it all.

“The legal case has given us peace of mind and security for the future, and for that we are grateful.”

No matter how high the standards of care and treatment in our health services, things can sometimes go wrong.

Medical negligence occurs if you receive substandard treatment by a medical professional, whether that’s directly causing an injury, or making an injury or condition worse.

Medical negligence can also happen if you are misdiagnosed, receive the wrong treatment, or a mistake is made during surgery.

Read more: Clinical and Medical Negligence Compensation Claims

Download guide

Life After Birth Injury

Life after birth injury for you and your child.

hudgell-solicitors-life-after-birth-injury-pdf-brochure-image

Related Advice

Related Advice

Expertise. Trust. Authority

View All
hudgell solicitors medical negligence solicitor samantha darwin

NHS Investigation Reports

What is an NHS Investigation Report and what can you expect from one? These reports are produced by NHS Trusts following an investigation into a serious incident which occurred during a patient’s medical care. They can highlight lapses in treatment and organisational systems, such as appointments not being sent out. Reports should also identify steps […]

hudgell solicitors medical negligence solicitor samantha darwin

How to Make a Medical Complaint

If you’re not happy with the medical treatment you or a member of your family has received, you are legally entitled to have your concerns investigated. You should also receive a full response from the healthcare provider. Listen to Samantha Darwin, a senior medical negligence solicitor at Hudgells, explain how to make a formal complaint […]

Related News

Related News
View All
team of surgeons concept medical negligence hospital negligence featured image

Reviews find Great Ormond Street surgeon caused ‘serious harm’ though ‘unacceptable’ treatment and surgeries chosen for children

A review into treatment provided by a children’s surgeon at Great Ormond Street Hospital has raised questions over whether he was suitably qualified and trained to lead the treatment of patients – following concerns that ‘serious harm’ was caused to his patients. Hudgell Solicitors is representing the families of a number of children treated by […]

6 min read time
hospital porter concept company news thirlwall inquiry feature image

NHS Whistleblowers group says report highlighting Government’s ‘lack of progress’ on various patient safety Inquiry recommendations is ‘gravely concerning’

A group representing hundreds of healthcare professionals from across the UK says it is ‘gravely concerning’ that an independent report has highlighted a ‘lack of progress’ from the Government in implementing changes recommended at various inquiries to improve patient safety. The report, commissioned by the Health and Social Committee and led by Professor Dame Jane […]

3 min read time
nurse treating patient concept inquests and public inquries nhs whistleblowers feature image

Hundreds of health professionals apply to be part of The Thirlwall Inquiry aiming to highlight ‘NHS culture detrimental to patient safety’

A group of hundreds of consultants, doctors, midwives, nurses and other healthcare professionals from across the UK have applied to be involved in the Thirlwall Inquiry. The Inquiry is to examine events at the Countess of Chester Hospital and their implications, following the trial, and subsequent convictions, of former neonatal nurse Lucy Letby. NHSWB (NHS […]

7 min read time
Start my claim