Medical Negligence

Damages for patient who developed sepsis after hospital twice sent him home with MRSA

hull royal concept medical negligence hospital negligence mini image
vince shore hudgell solicitors

Vince Shore

Joint Head of Clinical Negligence (Hull)

4 min read time

A patient developed sepsis and needed treatment in intensive care after being sent home from hospital twice despite having tested positive for MRSA.

It took 55 days from the presence of the bacteria first being picked up by screening for the 77-year-old to be treated.

However, over this time his condition had worsened and he had to be admitted to intensive care at Hull Royal Infirmary, having developed sepsis.

He spent more than a month in the hospital and independent medical experts say the error, and long-term health impact, will likely result in him having a reduced life expectancy.

Now, following a legal case on his behalf, led by medical negligence claims lawyers at Hudgell Solicitors, a five-figure damages settlement has been agreed.

Arrange a call back

Your contact details +

 

The matter was subject to a serious incident review at Trust

Vince Shore, joint head of clinical negligence at Hudgell Solicitors, said the case had been subject to a Serious Incident Investigation within Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, as the results of two positive screenings for MRSA were not acted upon, or communicated to the patient He said:

This was a very serious breach of duty of care in that my client twice presented at hospital – seven weeks apart – and on both occasions he was sent home before results of screening tests were available, each of which showed him to be positive for MRSA.

Within hours of being discharged home for the second time he was readmitted with evidence of severe sepsis. His condition deteriorated over the next few hours following admission and he was taken to intensive care.

Blood cultures identified MRSA as the cause of his sepsis.

Screening for ‘superbug’ routinely carried out by hospitals

MRSA is commonly referred to as a ‘superbug’ as it is a type of bacteria that is resistant to several widely used antibiotics, making it harder to treat than other bacterial infections, and mainly affects people in hospital.

Routine screening tests are usually carried out to check a patient’s skin for MRSA before they are admitted to stay overnight in a hospital, with treatment provided to remove the bacteria and reduce the risk of infection if it is found.

As part of the case, it was alleged the Trust had breached its duty of care when failing to ensure decolonisation treatment was provided following the first positive MRSA screening.

It was also alleged there had been a failure to treat the patient with appropriate antibiotics following his second admission to hospital on November 11, 2019, given his medical records confirmed he had been MRSA positive.

The patient should have been treated immediately on first admission

Mr Shore says an independent consultant in general medicine and infectious diseases, consulted as part of the case to give an opinion on the treatment provided, said the standard practice would have been for the patient to undergo immediate ‘decolonisation therapy’ on his first hospital admission.

It transpired that a letter was sent to my client’s GP and his treating consultant alerting them to the first positive MRSA screen but neither arranged for treatment to take place,

There appeared to be a lack of clarity regarding who was responsible for organising the decolonisation and this was identified in the Trust’s own Serious Incident Investigation.

When finally discharged, after the period in intensive care, he was placed on lifelong medication to prevent the possibility of persisting infections, as he will be susceptible given he had a pacemaker fitted some years ago.

It was our case that, on the balance of probabilities, had my client been given decolonisation therapy following the positive MRSA screening swab taken on his first admission following a collapse at home, then he would not have developed MRSA and would therefore not have returned to hospital again.

He would have thereby avoided that admission to hospital, the time he spent in Intensive Care and the need for to be on lifelong medication to prevent future infections.

Trust admitted breach of duty of care

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust admitted the MRSA screening should have been noted and actioned on the patient’s first visit, especially given he had a pacemaker fitted and was a regular visitor to the inpatient and healthcare unit due to this.

It was also admitted that there had been a failure to note and action a second MRSA screening on November 11, 2019.

Start my claim

vince shore hudgell solicitors
Vince Shore is Joint Head of Clinical Negligence (Hull) at Hudgell Solicitors specialising in Medical Negligence.
Download guide

Righting Wrongs

We are passionate about righting wrongs and committed to putting the interests of our clients first.

righting wrongs brochure cover 2025

Related Advice

Related Advice

Expertise. Trust. Authority

View All
tracy stansfield hudgell solicitors profile feature

Child Brain Injuries at Birth

One in ten cases of cerebral palsy is due to medical negligence by a midwife, doctor, or medical team. Complications either before or at the time of birth can also lead to other lifelong injuries such as Erb’s Palsy and Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE). Medical negligence lawyer Maria Repanos explains how a baby’s birth injury […]

hospital empty corridor concept medical negligence company news feature image

Common questions, misconceptions and advice about making a medical negligence compensation claim

In this article experienced Chartered Legal Executive, Ronke Bain, answers the common questions about clinical negligence claims. What is clinical negligence, and does it differ from medical negligence? Clinical negligence occurs when a healthcare professional provides substandard care that directly causes harm to a patient. This can include misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, surgical errors, medication mistakes […]

6 min read time
hudgell solicitors medical negligence solicitor samantha darwin

NHS Investigation Reports

What is an NHS Investigation Report and what can you expect from one? These reports are produced by NHS Trusts following an investigation into a serious incident which occurred during a patient’s medical care. They can highlight lapses in treatment and organisational systems, such as appointments not being sent out. Reports should also identify steps […]

hudgell solicitors medical negligence solicitor samantha darwin

How to Make a Medical Complaint

If you’re not happy with the medical treatment you or a member of your family has received, you are legally entitled to have your concerns investigated. You should also receive a full response from the healthcare provider. Listen to Samantha Darwin, a senior medical negligence solicitor at Hudgells, explain how to make a formal complaint […]

Related News

Related News
View All
team of surgeons performing surgery on child concept medical negligence great ormond street hospital feature

Report highlights shocking failings of Great Ormond Street Hospital in managing department at centre of scandal around surgeon Yaser Jabbar

Some families who we represent have now received the report detailing the findings of a Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) investigation into the performance of Great Ormond Street Hospital’s (GOSH) paediatric surgery department – and in particular, Yaser Jabbar orthopaedic surgeon. And, although the report is heavily redacted, I have no doubt it will still […]

5 min read time
two men in the hospital concept medical negligence company news feature

Lord Darzi’s report must lead to more than promises of change – it needs investment and action to improve patient outcomes

At Hudgell Solicitors we welcome the publication of Lord Darzi’s Independent Investigation of the National Health Service in England. The report highlights the severe difficulties within the health service, and whilst it highlights the passion and talent of its employees, it is currently very sadly letting patients down at every stage of life, with a […]

2 min read time
team of surgeons concept medical negligence hospital negligence featured image

Reviews find Great Ormond Street surgeon caused ‘serious harm’ though ‘unacceptable’ treatment and surgeries chosen for children

A review into treatment provided by a children’s surgeon at Great Ormond Street Hospital has raised questions over whether he was suitably qualified and trained to lead the treatment of patients – following concerns that ‘serious harm’ was caused to his patients. Hudgell Solicitors is representing the families of a number of children treated by […]

6 min read time

About us

About us

Hudgell Solicitors is an award-winning national legal firm which has been passionate about ‘righting wrongs’ since 1997. Our expert lawyers and solicitors provide access to justice and unrivalled client care.

Start my claim